SysLog.gr

SysLog.gr

Performance Tuning Java Garbage Collector

Sample ImageThis document is a summary or outline of Sun's document: Tuning Garbage collection with the 1.4.2 Hotspot JVM located here: http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/gc1.4.2/

 

1.0 Introduction

  • For many applications garbage collection performance is not significant
  • Default collector should be first choice


2.0 Generations

  • Most straightforward GC will just iterate over every object in the heap and determine if any other objects reference it.
    • This gets really slow as the number of objects in the heap increase
  • GC's therefor make assumptions about how your application runs.
  • Most common assumption is that an object is most likely to die shortly after it was created: called infant mortality
  • This assumes that an object that has been around for a while, will likely stay around for a while.
  • GC organizes objects into generations (young, tenured, and perm) This is important!

 

2.1 Performance Considerations

  • Ways to measure GC Performance
    • Throughput – % of time not spent in GC over a long period of time.
    • Pauses – app unresponsive because of GC
    • Footprint – overall memory a process takes to execute
    • Promptness – time between object death, and time when memory becomes available
  • There is no one right way to size generations, make the call based on your applications usage.

2.2 Measurement

  • Throughput and footprint are best measured using metrics particular to the application.
  • Command line argument -verbose:gc output
    [GC 325407K->83000K(776768K), 0.2300771 secs]
    • GC – Indicates that it was a minor collection (young generation). If it had said Full GC then that indicates that it was a major collection (tenured generation).
    • 325407K – The combined size of live objects before garbage collection.
    • 83000K – The combined size of live objects after garbage collection.
    • (776768K) – the total available space, not counting the space in the permanent generation, which is the total heap minus one of the survivor spaces.
    • 0.2300771 secs – time it took for garbage collection to occur.
  • You can get more detailed output using -XX:+PrintGCDetails and -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps

3 Sizing the Generations

  • The -Xmx value determines the size of the heap to reserve at JVM initialization.
  • The -Xms value is the space in memory that is committed to the VM at init. The JVM can grow to the size of -Xmx.
  • The difference between -Xmx and -Xms is virtual memory (virtually committed)

3.1 Total Heap

  • Total available memory is the most important factor affecting GC performance
  • By default the JVM grows or shrinks the heap at each GC to keep the ratio of free space to live objects at each collection within a specified range.
    • -XX:MinHeapFreeRatio – when the percentage of free space in a generation falls below this value the generation will be expanded to meet this percentage. Default is 40
    • -XX:MaxHeapFreeRatio – when the percentage of free space in a generation exceeded this value the generation will shrink to meet this value. Default is 70
  • For server applications
    • Unless you have problems with pauses grant as much memory as possible to the JVM
    • Set -Xms and -Xmx close to each other or equal for a faster startup (removes constant resizing of JVM). But if you make a poor choice the JVM can't compensate for it.
    • Increase memory sa you increase # of processors because memory allocation can be parallelized.

3.2 The Young Generation

  • The bigger the young generation the less minor GC's, but this implies a smaller tenured generation which increases the frequency of major collections.
  • You need to look at your application and determine how long your objects live for to tune this.
  • -XX:NewRatio=3 – the young generation will occupy 1/4 the overall heap
  • -XX:NewSize – Size of the young generation at JVM init. Calculated automatically if you specify -XX:NewRatio
  • -XX:MaxNewSize – The largest size the young generation can grow to (unlimited if this value is not specified at command line)

3.2.1 Young Generation Guarantee

  • The -XX:SurvivorRatio option can be used to tune the number of survivor spaces.
  • Not often important for performance
    • -XX:SurvivorRatio=6 – each survivor space will be 1/8 the young generation
    • If survivor spaces are too small copying collection overflows directly into the tenured generation.
    • Survivor spaces too large uselessly empty
    • -XX:+PrintTenuringDistribution – shows the threshold chosen by JVM to keep survivors half full, and the ages of objects in the new generation.
  • Server Applications
    • First decide the total amount of memory you can afford to give the virtual machine. Then graph your own performance metric against young generation sizes to find the best setting.
    • Unless you find problems with excessive major collection or pause times, grant plenty of memory to the young generation.
    • Increasing the young generation becomes counterproductive at half the total heap or less (whenever the young generation guarantee cannot be met).
    • Be sure to increase the young generation as you increase the number of processors, since allocation can be parallelized.

4 Types of Collectors

  • Everything to this point talks about the default garbage collector, there are other GC's you can use
  • Throughput Collector – Uses a parallel version of the young generation collector
    • -XX:+UseParallelGC
    • Tenured collector is the same as in default
  • Concurrent Low Pause Collector
    • Collects tenured collection concurrently with the execution of the app.
    • The app is paused for short periods during collection
    • -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
    • To enable a parallel young generation GC with the concurrent GC add -XX:+UseParNewGC to the startup. Don't add -XX:+UseParallelGC with this option.
  • Incremental Low Pause Collector
    • Sometimes called Train Collector
    • Collects a portion of the tenured generation at each minor collection.
    • Tries to minimize large pause of major collections
    • Slower than the default collector when considering overall throughput
    • Good for client apps (my observation)
    • -Xincgc
  • Don't mix these options, JVM may not behave as expected.

4.1 When to use Throughput Collector

  • Large number of processors
  • Reduces serial execution time of app, by using multiple threads for GC
  • App with lots of threads allocating objects should use this with a large young generation
  • Server Applications (my observation)

4.2 The Throughput collector

  • By default the throughput collector uses the number of CPU's as its value for number of GC threads.
  • On a computer with one CPU it will not perform as well as the default collector
  • Overhead from parallel execution (synchronization costs)
  • With 2 CPU's the throughput collector performs as well as the default garbage collector.
  • With more then 2 CPU's you can expect to see a reduction in minor GC pause times
  • You can control the number of threads with -XX:ParallelGCThreads=n
  • Fragmentation can occur
    • Reduce GC threads
    • Increase Tenured Generation size

4.2.1 Adaptive Sizing

  • Keeps stats about GC times, allocation rates, and free space then sizes young and tenured generation to best fit the app.
  • J2SE 1.4.1 and later
  • -XX:+UseAdaptiveSizePolicy (on by default)

4.2.2 Aggressive Heap

  • Attempts to make maximum use of physical memory for the heap
  • Inspects computer resources (memory, num processors) and sets params optimal for long running memory allocation intensive jobs.
  • Must have at least 256MB of RAM
  • For lots of CPU's and RAM, but 1.4.1+ has shown improvements on 4-Way machines.
  • -XX:+AggressiveHeap

4.3 When to use the Concurrent Low Pause Collector

  • Apps that benefit from shorter GC pauses, and can share resources with GC during execution.
  • Apps with large sets of long living data (tenured generation)
  • Two or more processors
  • Interactive apps with modest tenured generation size, and one CPU

4.4 The Concurrent Low Pause Collector

  • Uses a separate GC thread to do parts of the major collection concurrently with the app threads.
  • Pauses App threads in the beginning of a collection and toward the middle (longer pause in middle)
  • The rest of the GC is in a single thread that runs at the same time as the app

4.4.1 Overhead of Concurrency

  • Doesn't provide much of an advantage on single processor machines.
  • Fragmentation can occur.
  • Two processor machine eliminates pauses due to the GC thread.
  • The more CPU's the advantages of concurrent collector increase.

4.4.2 Young Generation Guarantee

  • There has to be enough contiguous space available in the tenured generation for all objects in the eden and one survivor space.
  • A larger heap is needed compared to the default collector.
  • Add the size of the young generation to the tenured generation.

4.4.3 Full Collections

  • If the concurrent collector is unable to finish collecting the tenured generation before the tenured generation fills up, the application is paused and the collection is completed.
  • When this happens you should make some adjustments to your GC params

4.4.4 Floating Garbage

  • Floating Garbage – Objects that die while the GC is running (after they have been checked).
  • Increase the tenured generation by 20% to reduce floating garbage.

4.4.5 Pauses

  • First Pause – marks live objects – initial marking
  • Second Pause – remarking phase – checks objects that were missed during the concurrent marking phase due to the concurrent execution of the app threads.

4.4.6 Concurrent Phases

  • Concurrent Marking phase occurs between initial mark and remarking phase.
  • Concurrent sweeping phase collects dead objects after the remarking phase.

4.4.7 Measurements with the Concurrent Collector

  • Use -verbose:gc with -XX:+PrintGCDetails
  • vCMS-initial-mark shows GC stats for the initial marking phase
  • CMS-concurrent-mark – shows GC stats for concurrent marking phase.
  • CMS-concurrent-sweep – shows stats for concurrent sweeping phase
  • CMS-concurrent-preclean – stats for determining work that can be done concurrently
  • CMS-remark – stats for the remarking phase.
  • CMS-concurrent-reset – concurrent stuff is done, ready for next collection.

4.4.8 Parallel Minor Collection Options with Concurrent Collector

  • -XX:+UseParNewGC – for multiprocessor machines, enables multi threaded young generation collection.
  • -XX:+CMSParallelRemarkEnabled – reduce remark pauses

4.5 When to use the Incremental Low Pause Collector

  • Use when you can afford to tradeoff longer and more frequent young generation GC pauses for shorter tenured generation pauses
  • You have a large tenured generation
  • Single Processor

4.6 The Incremental Low Pause Collector

  • Minor collections same as default collector.
  • Don't use try to use parallel GC with this collector
  • Incrementally Collects parts of the tenured generation at each young collection.
  • Tries to avoid long major collections by doing small chunks each minor collection.
  • Can cause fragmentation of the heap. Sometimes need to increase tenured generation size compared to the default.
  • There is some overhead required to maintain the position of the incremental collector. Less overhead than is required by the default collector.
  • First try the default collector, and adjust heap sizing. If major pauses are too long try incremental.
  • If the incremental collector can't collect the tenured generation fast enough you will run out of memory, try reducing the young generation.
  • If young generation collections do not free any space, could be because of fragmentation. Increase tenured generation size.

4.6.1 Measurements with the Incremental Collector

  • -verbose:gc and -XX:+PrintGCDetails
  • Look for the Train: to see the stats for the incremental collection.

5 Other Considerations

  • The permanent generation may be a factor on apps that dynamically generate and load many classes (JSP, CFM application servers)
  • You may need to increase the MaxPermSize, eg: -XX:MaxPermSize=128m
  • Apps that rely on finalization (finalize method, or finally clauses) will cause lag in garbage collection. This is a bad idea, use only for errorious situations.
  • Explicit garbage collection calls (System.gc()) force a major collection. You can measure the effectiveness of these calls by disabling them with -XX:+DisableExplicitGC
  • RMI garbage collection intervals can be controlled with
    • -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInteraval=3600000
    • -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=3600000
  • On Solaris 8+ you can enable libthreads, lightweight thread processes, these may increase thread performance.
  • To enable add /usr/lib/lwp to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
  • Soft References cleared less aggressively in server.
  • -XX:SoftRefLRUPolicyMSPerMB=10000
  • Default value is 1000, or one second per MB

6 Conclusion

  • GC can be bottleneck in your app.

More Information

 

Source :
http://www.petefreitag.com/articles/gctuning/

Comments are Closed

© 2019: SysLog.gr | Easy Theme by: D5 Creation | Powered by: WordPress