This weekend SlashGear published “Reasons to Abandon Windows For Linux,” making their case to “Windows users who are curious about the state of Linux for mainstream computing.” It tries to enumerate specific reasons why Linux might be the better choice, arguing among other things that:
Updates on Linux are fast and “rarely call for a restart” — and are also more complete. “Updates are typically downloaded through a ‘Software Updater’ application that not only checks for operating system patches, but also includes updates for the programs that you’ve installed from the repository.” Windows “tries to serve a variety of markets…cramming in a scattered array of features” — and along those lines, that Microsoft “has gradually implemented monetization schemes and methods for extracting user data.” And yet you’re still paying for that operating system, while Linux is less bloated and “free forever.”
“Because less people use Linux, the platform is less targeted by malware and tends to be more secure than Windows”
The article also touches on a few other points (including battery life), and predicts that problems with Windows are “bound to get worse over time and will only present more of a case for making the switch to Linux.”
Long-time Slashdot reader shanen shared the article, along with some new thoughts on why people really stay with Windows:
I think the main “excuse” is the perception of reliability, which is really laughable if you’ve actually read the EULA. Microsoft certainly doesn’t have to help anyone at all. I would argue that Windows support is neither a bug nor a feature, but just a marketing ploy.
Their original submission suggests that maybe Linux needs to buttress the perception of its reliability with a better financial model — possibly through a new kind of crowd funding which could also be extended to all open source software, or even to journalism).
of this story at Slashdot.
Source:: Slashdot