Every hacker has an assortment of USB to TTL-serial adapters kicking around in their lab, and we have all been annoyed that each one has a different pinout. You layout a PCB or breadboard for the Sparkfun flavor (GND, CTS, VCC, TXD, RXD, DTR), but when you begin troubleshooting all you can find is a CH340 board (GND, +5V, TXD, RXD, DTR, +3.3V). You have to jumper everything, and it becomes a mess. It wasn’t much better back in the days of RS-232 level signaling, either. While the pinouts were consistent, there were other headaches. Did the connection need a NULL modem adaptor? And if you were unlucky, you might need a DB-25 to DE-9 adaptor, and the really unlucky might need one or more gender changers. Surely there’s a better way.

It turns out there was a better way, although it didn’t seem to have become as popular as one might expect. Back in 1987 [Dave Yost] formalized an interconnection scheme using RJ45 plugs and jacks while at Berkeley. The signals were arranged in a mirrored fashion so that each cable is always a crossover — just plug two cables back-to-back if you really need a straight thru connection.

Even though he was dealing with RS-232 serial, nothing prevents us from using this scheme for logic level signaling. For example, consider the following 1×10 header pinout, where the original 8-pins are expanded to 10 to allow for power:

From https://www.lammertbies.nl/comm/cable/yost-serial-rj45

” data-medium-file=”https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/yost-original-pinout-orange.jpg?w=400″ data-large-file=”https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/yost-original-pinout-orange.jpg?w=739″>
<img width="389" height="400" src="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/yost-modified-pinout-yellow.png?w=389" alt="" loading="lazy" srcset="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/yost-modified-pinout-yellow.png 461w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/yost-modified-pinout-yellow.png?resize=243,250 243w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/yost-modified-pinout-yellow.png?resize=389,400 389w" sizes="(max-width: 389px) 100vw, 389px" data-attachment-id="453903" data-permalink="https://hackaday.com/2020/12/25/modified-yost-tames-pinout-plethora/yost-modified-pinout-yellow/" data-orig-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/yost-modified-pinout-yellow.png" data-orig-size="461,474" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta='{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}' data-image-title="yost-modified-pinout-yellow" data-image-description="

” data-medium-file=”https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/yost-modified-pinout-yellow.png?w=389″ data-large-file=”https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/yost-modified-pinout-yellow.png?w=461″>

This is an extreme example, and can obviously be shrunk depending on how much handshaking, if any, or power is desired. Such a pinout lets you switch between DCE and DTE by simply flipping the connector around. And if a Dupont-style header slips off too easily in your applications, you could always use an RJ connector. This still doesn’t solve the Tower of Babel pinout problem with the USB-TTL adaptors. But standardizing on a serial pinout such as this for your projects and making cables or kludging your TTL adaptors will make serial debugging less painful.

Back when he released this scheme in 1987, [Dave] pontificated:

“Maybe one day before the year 2,000, the world will have a new, simple, high-speed, flow-controlled, standard type of connection for point-to-point applications currently using RS-232, with an adaptor available to talk to old, RS-232 equipment.”

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

…read more

Source:: Hackaday